Israeli protests in January 2023 in headline news & bulletin news

Israel PM Defends ‘Necessary’ Judicial Reform Vote as Protests Flare

headline news bulletin news

By Rosie Scammell and Jay Deshmukh

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday defended as “necessary” parliament’s vote for a key clause of the government’s controversial judicial reform package, defying mass protests and international concern. bulletin news

Netanyahu and his coalition allies approved the bill earlier on Monday following a stormy parliamentary session, which saw opposition lawmakers boycott the decisive vote with some shouting “shame, shame”.

Critics charge the judicial revamp could open the way to more authoritarian government by removing checks and balances on the Israeli executive.

The bill passed with 64 votes in the 120-seat chamber. It aims to limit the powers of the Supreme Court in striking down government decisions which the judges deem “unreasonable”.

The premier justified the decision to press ahead with the vote as a “necessary democratic step”.

“We passed the amendment on reasonableness so that the elected government can carry out policy in line with the decision of the majority of the citizens of the country,” he said in a televised address.

Israel’s traditional bedrock ally Washington has repeatedly raised concern about the political turmoil and described Monday’s vote as “unfortunate”.

Netanyahu’s coalition government, which includes far-right and ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties, argues that the proposed changes are needed to ensure a better balance of power.

The reform package has triggered one of the biggest protest movements in Israel’s history since it was unveiled by the government in January.

The Histadrut trade union confederation threatened a nationwide strike in response to the parliamentary vote, urging the government to resume negotiations with the opposition.

“Any unilateral progress of the reform will have serious consequences,” Histadrut chairman Arnon Bar-David said in a statement.

A walkout staged by Histadrut in March within hours prompted Netanyahu to halt the legislative process, paving the way for cross-party talks which ultimately collapsed.

“Really sad”

Protesters gathered throughout the day outside parliament, where they blew horns, beat drums and waved Israeli flags.

Rallies continued into the evening on Monday in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, the country’s commercial hub, while demonstrators blocked roads.

Police used water cannon and mounted officers were deployed against the crowds.

“I thought there would be a change or a compromise, but deep inside I knew this would happen and it’s really sad,” protester Danny Akerman, 52, told AFP after the vote.

“We need to continue the protest, continue to put pressure, in the hope that they won’t continue with more” such initiatives, he said.

The vote took place hours after Netanyahu, 73, returned to the Knesset only a day after undergoing surgery to have a pacemaker fitted.

The White House said US President Joe Biden has “expressed his views that major changes in a democracy, to be enduring, must have as broad a consensus as possible”.

headline news bulletin news

“It is unfortunate that the vote today took place with the slimmest possible majority,” a statement said.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog, just back from a Washington trip, had gone to Netanyahu’s hospital room on Sunday in a last-minute effort to reach a compromise.

Herzog, who had tried but failed to broker negotiations after half a year of mass street protests, earlier warned that Israel faced a “national emergency”.

The driving force behind the revamp, Justice Minister Yariv Levin, said there was “no reason to fear” the clause.

“There are many reasons to see it as an important step in returning the balance between the government branches,” he told parliament at the end of a marathon debate leading up to the vote.

After the legislation passed, the minister said he wanted to “reach an agreement” on the broader reform package.

But opposition leader Yair Lapid described Monday’s move in parliament as a “defeat for Israeli democracy”.

“The government can decide a policy but not change the character of the State of Israel, and that’s what happened today,” he said.

“Crazy speed”

Speaking near parliament ahead of the vote, demonstrator Alona Kesel, a 26-year-old high-tech worker, criticised the government for forging ahead with the judicial overhaul at “crazy speed”.

Opponents accuse Netanyahu, who has been fighting corruption charges in court, of a conflict of interest.

The “reasonableness” clause is the first major component of the reform package to become law. Other proposed changes include allowing the government a greater say in the appointment of judges.

The protests have drawn support from across the political spectrum and among secular and religious groups, blue-collar and tech sector workers, peace activists and military reservists.

Another protester, teacher Avital Mesterman, vowed to “do whatever I can do democratically” and keep protesting.

“I feel that we’re going down, but I feel optimistic because of all the people that are here,” said the 42-year-old, who had travelled from Tel Aviv to join the Jerusalem rally.

mib-rsc-jd/ami

© Agence France-Presse. All rights are reserved.

Notes from APS Radio News

According to ANS, the Biden administration has expressed some degree of oppostion to Mr. Netanyahou’s policy of implementing changes to Israel’s judicial system.

ANS reports that the Netanyahou government has responded by communicating that Mr. Biden’s advice is unwanted, where jucidicial reforms are concerned.

Still, unlike other matters, for example, Israel’s policy with respect to the West Bank & its building more settlements there, and the administration’s attempts to revive an agreement with Iran concerning the direction of its nuclear program, the disagreement, to the extent it’s affecting US-Israel relations, turns on something a number of analysts view as an internal or domestic matter, in respect of Israel.

There appears to be a divide in Israel, pertaining to that country’s elections and the government’s policy of reducing the power of the judiciary, according to ANS reports.

One part of Israel favors a stronger judiciary, which that part views as means by which to protect and foster a more secular and more pluralistic country.

The other part, which is more conservative, views reforms to its judiciary as a means by which to foster a more theocratic and nationalistic society, observers say.

headline news bulletin news

online news world news headline news
APS Radio News